Saturday, August 28, 2010

Marky Is A Mod But...

Antoinette wrote:

"Something is not right with him. I can't put my finger on it but he's the 1st person on here that I don't trust. Yes his jokes are sometimes funny but the rest of his comments seem to be negative against this forum. He left this one in SSS this morning."

Re: Can we try something on here with blog owners please?
Marky Today at 7:41 am

i realised that a little ways back. so if there's a mole in the mods section, it's one of you guys. as for who it is that's passed out info from this section...

personally, i've never been comfortable with those who choose to hide their online status.

FSoares replied:

"I read that comment and I was about to answer him, but then decided not to, because I don't want to start any conflict with a member. It's a very unfortunate comment by Mark. There are still some members who did not understand what happened yet, or pretend they don't.
Even today I read ChaosRaptors and how I wish I could know who are the members here who posted there anonymously who still say Eddie wasn't the mole, etc. It's rather annoying."

Eddie says: Something is not right with Marky but now they have made him a moderator

Monday, August 2, 2010

Pull The Other One

Panda wrote: Actually [redacted], this was the way Beattie got hacked. A post with his/her name on the thread was altered and appeared on BonnyBraes as a disgusting post supposedly written by Beattie. Another poster spotted it and told one of the Moderators that Beattie would never write anything like that but He/ She was banned anyway.

Get a grip, woman, Panda and Beattie are the same person.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Dusk Till Dawn

New private area according to Little Birdie.

Members a couple of weeks ago. Some have bitten the dust since then.

Ambersuz, pm, MsTaken, lubelle, fuzeta, Allstar, YoullNeverGuess, Quincy, Krisy22, laurie, Angelina, Antoinette, lincs, Jennifer, Dogwood, jjp, mumbles, lynn, charlie, FSoares, MCXLIII, lnorton, halfamo, kitti, Christine, fizzbomb200, amethyst, carlymichelle, dazedandconfused, fishie, julygirl3210, wjk, woodward, Dimsie, Skybolt, Bren, ann_chovey, Marky, CaptnMorgan, mara thon, saloongirl, MaryPoppins, patat, Judge Dread, Schnuffel, MJH1901, AntiCS, Photon, Heartsease, MoondampRoses, lea, Fudge, Alfiefinn, Alpine Aster, MilkyWay, frankie stein, margaret, Annabel, fred, Claudia79, the one and only big_l, Roasted Arizona, roisin, Kazlux, deborah, HiDeHo, Lioned, Badboy, tabs, The Famous Grouse, flower, Lilemor, Jem, T4two, MaryB, Hare, AnnaEsse, malena stool, welshy, Frangendapenik, Estelle, RIORITA, pamalam, keepingmum, POPPY1, Luz, ashwil, Maelstrom, pennylane

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Read what our good friend, Larry the Lemur says.
Like Eddie, Norman always tells the truth.
Monty the mole is still burrowing away and will have news for us soon.

Friday, April 9, 2010

SSS: Government Involvement :)))

carly: i have never understand in the last 2 anda half years we pro maddie have been harrased slandered out and yet we are supposed to take it and not fight back why are those people and the uk goverment so behind gerry and kate???no offence to little maddie but what makes her any diffremt from other mising kids? that dont even get a mention in the media

Angelina: I'm not convinced there is Gvt involvement. If there is then I feel it could be because GB got involved right at the start in an effort to impress the public (thinking in his usual manner that he would save the day and get her found), then it went tits up and he has now tried to play everything down so he won't look stupid. Anything more complicated than that I'm not sure about.

If I'm wrong and there is more to the Gvt involvement, then I have no idea what is being covered up.

As for ordinary pros, I'm sure they do honestly believe the McCanns are innocent and feel sorry for them.

Plus it's a sort of mob mentality and brain-washing (not organised but just by being part of it if you see what I mean). They've got carried away and it's brought out the worst in them (anti's can be just as bad at times).

I think a lot of them have got together (I know for sure there was a big meeting in Wales some months back) and now they've formed a sort of club, but sadly the real little girl in the midde of it all has long been forgotten.

I've noticed on Sky there is a sort of formation that rolls into action at times...the lower ranks come out to fight, then the next level and finally the big's all rehearsed and organised. The same stock answers come out time and time a mantra almost.

Eddie says: OK, this is a new game. If anyone alludes in any way to potential involvement of government, you all shout in unison "GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT!" Got it. :)))


Allstar: To me it seems like the govt want to keep alot quiet as half whats in the files havent been released to the pubic via the media. If someone can come up with an explanation for that then I'll believe the govt arent protecting the Mccanns.


Woodward: morning all-The REASON WHY THE "pros" are so vicious could simply be because they can be-none of us has carter -ruck on a retainer,none of us are able to pick the ,phone up and instruct a tabloid journalist to have a go at someone-they are vituperous ,slanderous and vile because there are no consequences . We on the other hand are ,quite rightly imo, restricted and restrained by the law-gratuitous insults have no place in our arguments our opinions have to be carefully shrouded in disclaimers and tempered by fairness backed up-most importantly by reason-it all makes for a slower more restrained discussion which means the pros can jump in with irrelevances and half truths which then literally make any casual reader lose the thread-that is the intent and it works-the best reference for people iinterested in the case is ,imo, the mccannfiles, I would always recommend it to those who want to learn more of the ever changing story and its chronology

julygilr3120: We will never give up discussing this case, despite attempts to stop us. We will regroup, much to the chagrin of the ex-mods forum, and the press whom they profess to have been in contact with. And the government doesn't scare me either. The present shower are on the way out anyhow. The unelected PM with a name the colour of sh*t is in the last chance saloon.


Patty O'Daws: I could understand the McCanns paying people, but the government? I know Clarrie said it was the function of MMU to control what came out in the media...but to pay people to troll forums?

Would the government really do that?


Stimulator: You are waking up! Yes the government Mi5, and the 'doughnut' brigade (GCHQ) are/have been infiltrating forums and 'subversive' groups online for years! to the 'paranoid shift'....


fred: I'd say pretty close. I don't think Amaral will leave this case alone, even if it takes him years to get the truth out, he is being hindered at every occasion, not just from the parents but, the governemnt and British authorities.


Heartsease: Away with all accusations etc and concentrate on ways we can get the investigation opened. Surely that is what everyone wants after all?
I just want to see justice done in this case. I want the government to put a little girl first and start asking relevant questions.
Whatever happened in PDL needs to be uncovered and the truth told.
To the world you may be just one person,
but to one life you may be the world.


More Economy With The Truth

carly in an open letter: hi i dont mean this to cause trouble i like this forum lots and ikm not angry at anyone BUT i dont like being lied too i now know why i cant see the private forum because some of you think im sharing log ins etc let me make it clear now in no way do i share my log ins with anyone nor do i allow others to tell me to do anything im only here for maddie and the mssing other children as i said i like this forum but it is not right to lie about the reasons why forums that you were allowed in for months and months you are suddenly not allowed and of all places to read about it at the twats etc is not right IMO im just a forumer wanting the justice for maddie she deserves and that is all i have no problems with anyone on this forum but IMO the truth is better then being lied too most people have known me on forums for 3 years and know im not like this i guess it hurt me that people would be talking behind my back and saying these things about me its like primary school again when kids used to do it to me im sorry but i had to say something unlike what some other think im not stupid and i dont like being treated like it i dont want to argue im not like that

Antoinette replied: Carly no one suspects you of anything. The SSS was closed down to all members except mods as we don't want anything more being printed about any of you or the comments you all have made in those sections.

Eddie says: No that reply is totally untrue. The had a secret section, SSSection, which was infiltrated on several fronts. So they decided to set up a new secret section, The Leisure Centre, deleting all those SSS members they did not trust. Later on, both sections were still infiltrated and they decided to close the SSS to all members except mods. When TLC opened, we had this

Ambersuz: I hate making rules amongst friends but for the sake of our privacy we need to have just a few in place, so here goes:

1. NO links to other forums in this section unless you add some xxxx's within the link so no one can directly click onto it.

2. This forum should not be mentioned outside of this section whatsoever.

Then we have this today:

Antoinette: there was no process of elimination. All members were locked out at the same time. If we were trying to eliminate anyone we would have taken them out one by one not altogether.

Eddie says: Not true, is it? When in a hole, stop digging. Oops, here comes trouble...

Ambersuz: Carly I dont mean to be mean girly but you are getting very paranoid lately and after all the time I spent explaining this via pm's why are you now making this public?

I'll say it again to you here.....

If you keep taking those blogs and forums personal then you have 2 options.....either DONT read them or read them and be upset by have been saying for the last year here that they are liars and here you are believing them?

May I remind everyone that the usergroups are for people I invite in for whatever reasons I choose to create them....if you are in or out then I have my reasons for adding or removing members and those reasons I do NOT have to discuss with every single member of this forum before I make those decisions so if you dont like the forum or the way I run it then feel free to create your own....Simple isnt it?

I cant keep everyone here happy and to be honest I'm past caring as this forum is not providing a service to anyone! This was a friendly forum where everyone was happy to come here and now all I get is bitching or trolls here trying to take the forum down and pretending we have viruses here!

Now I'm not getting paranoid and I would think after all the hard work the mods and myself have put into this forum I would be the first one worried....but I'm not because I wont let the idiots like Majic and his bitch witches get me down like they seem to get you down!

Eddie says: Any reasonable person can see what the truth is here.

Sherlock, They Don't Know Jack Schitt 2

Ambersuz: I've started a new section and intend on leaving quite a few out of it until I see who it is so for now try and avoid the SSS and discuss only on the new section (TLC) or Portugal or here..

OK can anyone see it yet?

Harvesmom: I can

eddiemod; Me too

Ambersuz: ok cool so only the mods are in !!

who else?

...I mean 100% all agreed we want them there!

So if at least 2 of us doesnt trust (for instance)...Carly then Carly is out. But it has to be 2 mods who agree.....fair?

Harvesmom: Yes thats fair Amber. The only thing is you've mentioned on the SSS that you are setting up a new section , those that arent invited are going to be moaning like drains about it. Maybe you should say you've changed your mind and you dont care if they can read or something?

Ambersuz: Oh dont worry about that....when people pm me asking where it is...I'll say I bluffed to get the trolls wondering where it is....

[General chit chat...]

eddie mods pulls them into line: We are chatting on Amber's serious thread.

There is a chat thread on the new section

FSoares on "twats": What a bunch of idiots they are, looking like those bully kids at school! Sometimes I think if I had the misfortune to be one of their mothers, I would spank them till they would go to hospital, completely black from the bruises! Gosh, they're so irritating.

Ambersuz: I'm thinking of bringing threads over to the new section so they are stuck with just the ones about the twats....

OUCH just thought..............the Miss World one is there! I dont want them to ever find that...but I think its a bit late. [No schitt, we don't do personal stuff.]

David: Also is TLC a hidden group? [sort of hidden. :) ]

Ambersuz: Yes it is....all the groups are [sort of :) ]

David: Eddie has been very quiet on his/her blog. Who is Eddie? I confuse all their names [Eddie's just this guy, you know.]

Ambersuz: I think Eddie is CrazyTony on Twats....but dont quote me

He's gone quiet cause he's not in the SSS

[Come off it.]

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Sherlock, They Don't Know Jack Schitt

In days of old before the eddiemodgate scandal.

Harvemom: We do have a mole who can see the SSS. Or someone has been careless following links, but I dont think there has been any links for a while.

They've copied Lauras comment on this thread in the SSS onto that daft blog something to do with diseased minds:

FSoares: I'm with Harversmom. There's a mole or someone inside is pretending. Now there's no doubt.

Harvesmom: Well i've just been through everyone who's logged on since 2pm, and compared the list to who is in the SSS. But of course it doesnt tell you the members that come in as hidden.

FSoares: That's exactly the problem. I need to go to bed, because tomorrow I have to start at 9am, but during the day, if I don't have to go out, I'll keep an eye as well, though I can't be paying too much attention. It'll be just a small control.

Harvesmom: Well i've added all the people who've been in as hidden in the last 24 hours, and to be honest 90 percent of the members of the SSS have been logged on so it hasnt helped much....

David: I am with you both on this. I think someone has been careless clicking links. BUT because the internet is a logical world we need to cover all aspects i.e. eliminate the possibility of a double agent working for the TWATS as FSoares mentioned on SSS...

I still dont believe there is a mole but still....the only way to stop anyone seeing this section is to take it all down.

Ambersuz: I personally dont care what they see so I'll leave it up to all of you to make the decision if it should stay or go

eddiemod: You can see who's hidden - they are in italics [No schitt.]

FSoares: In my opinion, if the section is kept, everybody needs to remember there's someone from the twats (or linked to them) who is registered on this forum, with access to the SSS. What saddens me is knowing we can't talk openly or post something there more sensitive, because they will get access to it. I personally think there's no point in having the section, if there's no privacy. I know many of you generally say "I don't care if they read". Well, I also don't care if they read, IF what I post are merely my opinions. However, sometimes we have things we could say, but we don't because we know they are reading it and that info cannot reach their hands.
It's quite obvious there's a fake identity on the SSS, probably a cloned account, or a double agent. In the present situation the SSS's existence is a pure falacy.

Ambersuz: OK here's what we should do.....

If all the mods look at the members in the SSS and make a list here of who should be in a new section....I know its easier moving them to the Portugal section but thats not fair as that section was set up just for the Portuguese posters and as thats 100% safe I dont want to rock the boat there.

I'd rather have just a few people in the new section...maybe 15 or 20 and leave it at that.

Obviously all the mods are who else can be trusted and who are you all comfortable with?

FSoares: I have no idea about carlymichelle, except she is a computer game addict and she posts in all forums related to Australian TV. She's been bad mouthed by the Twats & Co, and according to it, my bet would be on someone else, though. However, Carlymichelle can be used by someone (posing as a friend) to get the contents and info from her.

Claudia79: Well, as I'm a Benfica supporter I've been telling lies to myself for quite some time! [No schitt, Liverpool 4 Benfica 1]

eddiemod: Firstly Amber, please don't think we're all in Paranoid City here....I just have instincts, I watch that person and I just 'feel' that person is odd.

Ok secondly, I understand when you say that so what it doesn't matter if there is a mole - I agree. It's just bloody annoying that's all.

Thirdly, if I were a mole on a forum I would be IT smart (smarter than most too) I would already have 3 or 4 ID's (all very different) in case one of them was found out and I would use different email addys, and IP's etc etc

So in a nutshell I will look at the list and tell you what I think, we'll all compare lists and go from there.

Ambersuz: One thing I'd like to say is I will not add Laffin to the list as he gets drunks and sprouts off nonsense......its not that I dont trust him but I just cant be bothered with his rants and me having to clear up his acusations.

Dont get me wrong......I'm the first one to expose people but only those ones who are attacking the forum and I'll only expose with proof....Nessling i believe was at one stage but Deuce I dont have any evidence of.

Picking on anyone because they are friends of, is not going to be allowed in the future as it adds us to their enemy list.

Photon asked me a few weeks back to let Laffin into the Portuguese section and I said NO way! [No schitt, Sherlock]

Claudia79: Marky just made me raise my eyebrows on the SSS.

eddiemod: I agree about Laffin. [No schitt]

Ok here's the list of SS members I have crossed the ones I don't trust or don't know enough:

Maybe everyone else can do the same?

Alpine Aster
Frankie Stein
Laffin Assasin
mara thon
Reggie Dunlop
The Famous Grouse
the one and only big_l

ps Deborah is crazy that's why she's crossed and I don't particularly care for photon but haven't crossed her. [No schitt]

Eddie says: Next episode tomorrow...

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

How They Wanted To Spin It

Ambersuz: I want eddie to make a statement on the main forum saying that she is leaving for personal reasons so we can move on. I dont want for this to be an ongoing fight for her sake so I am giving her the easy way out. This is not going to become a BonnyBraes scenario all over again like it was with the 3A's!

I will leave eddie here until tomorrow and then ban her account. So I hope she makes her excuses on the main forum by then.

eddiemod: I am not LYING and making an announcement that I am leaving - I'll let you decide what you want to say Amber. Why don't you post your 'proof'? Such as it is.

Eddie says: We all now know that eddiemod is innocent but where's the apology. Fair's fair, as they say.

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Time For An Apology

We are getting a bit of thread drift here.

Ambersuz: Just letting you all know as he [David] is standing by eddie which I knew would happen whatever the weather but we ended on a good note....

I said he wasnt [sic] able to change my mind without proof and that proof is up to eddie to get from her new found friends....

I want the challenge answered....without it there's no apology!

Numbers Guy: I mentioned this to FSoares a while back.

I'm absolutely certain that they keep a 'file' on everyone of us. At JATYK they even mention your faulty computer back in Jan 12th and my help.

eddie was the one who PM'd me about your problem but there was also a few posts about the subject on SSS, so they could have picked it from there.

FSoares: Yes, like I told you I also believe they have a file about each on of us. This sounds pathetic, but they really must have. We can't slip nothing on keyboard, that they pick everything.

As for David, he really is a good boy and must have a long frienship [sic] with Eddie. Instead of trying to get the facts first, he is just defending her, and the best evidence he has, is that she can't screenshot. This is amazing as there's one sticky on how to screenshot, and I also remember we've explained Frangendapenik on the PT section, how to take screeenshots.

FSoares to Claudia79: Now they may threaten to post the pics of your cat!

(No we won't, nice little creature that it is.)

Ambersuz (indelicately): OMG they've hit the jackpot....your pussy and my all they need is someones [sic] ass!

Claudia79: He's a sniffer cat and he's the best at sniffing Whiskas, Friskies, Royal Canin, Sheba, Hills, etc.

Claudi79 (suggestively) : Isn't my pussy beautiful?

Ambersuz: Its [sic] the nicest I've seen hun

Numbers Guy: Bye , don't let the trolls give you nightmares.

Monday, April 5, 2010

Roman Numeral Man Is Watching

Not exactly GCHQ, is it?

Sunday, April 4, 2010

The Mods on LA

MCXLIII: We should find a way to lock Laffin for the night too.

Amber: Anyways I told him that if he wanted to come back he had to ensure that he was not to post any violent crap and NOT attack the members....I also told him that if he had any suspects to bring it to the mods to deal with. He agreed and I asked him if he thought the mole was eddie and he said he was sure he had made that clear. I told him in future to stop talking in fricking riddles as it would have saved alot of us all this stress.

FSoares: I've locked the "An apology from me" thread, because now it was slipping again to Laffin's threats and the fact he was allowed back. Oops, this is so crazy, that I've locked it, to avoid a snow ball effect. To be honest, I'm starting to get tired of all these members who can't cope with Laffin.

Claudia79: I'm fed up too. Feel like telling them to grow up.


Claudia79: You should be able to ban him at night and unban him in the morning!

MCXLIII: A ON/OFF switch with remote control

Claudia79: How many times can he repeat the same effing thing???

MCXLIII: As many times a he goes to the pub?

Claudia79: We should send him to rehab!

MsTaken: Laffin says the same thing over and over again therefore he isnt the ideal person to be critical of the bloggers but I doubt anyone can change his attitude.

Amber: He is going to get us more reports. I'm going to tell him to shut the fuck up or he's going to be banned!

This is his last warning!

I've sent him a strong warning...this is his last chance.

Claudia79: Is he really like that all the time or only when he drinks?
Does he ever learn?

Amber: I think he's around my age but even so.....I know he says he's looking out for this forum but we can handle it far more diplomatically than he has proved he can....besides all i need now is to waste more time on those pathetic litigations the trolls send the moment they see Laffin getting violent.

Saturday, April 3, 2010

From TLC

Yes, our mole can get that too. :)

Here is an example.


"I've put activation back to admin so they cant [sic] just log in...

The problem when admin activates they arent [sic] getting emails as there seems to be a glitch. Anyways I've banned the ip now as its [sic] using the same one."

More Evidence

We gave you the name. Now we give you the photo.

Friday, April 2, 2010

After Much Deep Thought...

this is our answer.

SSSection Lite

Members of SSSection seem to be slowly disappearing as the search for the mole goes on.

Moley is still there though.

Claudia79 fancies George Clooney. :)

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Catholics,
and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant.

and by that time no one was left to speak up."

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Disquiet In The SSS As Reason Starts to Surface To Realise Eddiemod Is Innocent

Marky: this section safe yet?

(Eddie: Depends what you mean by safe.)

Marky: i realised that a little ways back. so if there's a mole in the mods section, it's one of you guys. as for who it is that's passed out info from this section...

personally, i've never been comfortable with those who choose to hide their online status.

Antoinette: so if it's one of the mods that are left why hasn't there been any more leaks from the mods section.

(Eddie: We choose not to play your game.)

The Famous Grouse replies to Antoinette: So we will all think it was Eddie[mod]?

(Eddie: No, we don't want you to think that.)

FSoares: Are you all implying it was any of the other Mods then?

TFG: I am not implying anything, or accusing anyone. I just feel that although Eddie[mod] has left, and there are no more apparent leaks, it doesn't actually prove that it was Eddie[mod]. If I were a mole, and I wanted to deflect the blame onto somebody else, that's how I would have done it.

(Eddie: The first sentence is correct but the second isn't.)

Marky: they say it wasn't eddie[mod] and the mole is still in place. you say no leaks since eddie[mod] went. if the latter then no problem and it's all now just a windup to get the forum to turn on itself. just ignore it

(Eddie: It wasn't eddiemod. How many more times?)

Antoinette: Who is the blame being deflected on???
From what I can see I'm the one being blamed for posting the link. It has been proven that by clicking on these links that you cannot get into the mods section. So that theory didn't work.

Marky: there's someone moling in this section, there's no doubt of that.

(Eddie: OK, Sherlock.)

Angelina: How do you know?

I don't read any other forum (I seem to be banned from them all, don't know why) so I can't read anything.

Are you in the mod section?

Marky: the debate about hbts's avatar which was played out, i believe, in this section, has appeared post for post, on the deseased minds blog. i know. i read it, even got a credit. so was our little err, fun and games last friday afternoon when antoinette set me up to be a stripper; still owe you for that one corky!

(Eddie: for those of you in the SSS but not in the uber secret TLC, ask yourselves why not.)

Monday, March 29, 2010

FSoares: I've been trying to not comment here, but since Sunday night (21st march), nothing else has been leaked from the Mods section ...


David Demands An Apology

"I am absolutely livid and disgusted at the way eddie has been treated. She is not the mole and never was.

I am fuming because Harvesmom has been called a puppet on a string and subsequently me.

I come back after a week's holiday and have seen no indication of any truth whatsoever!

I am not naming anyone but to those who have trashed, manipulated, backstabbed and LIED I demand an apology. I am too bloody angry to post but when I have calmed down I will say my side of the story.

And Bren get off your high horse you are nothing but a liar!!"

How very true, David.

eddie is innocent
Harvesmom is innocent
David is innocent

Saturday, March 27, 2010

A little less Kama Sutra, a little more Sun Tzu

"And dont worry....BB1 is full of hot air...if my account could have been hacked they would have done it long ago and taken down this forum"

Strategy, Custer, strategy....

A Serious Matter

Ambersuz wrote:

"eds, if Bren's jealous of this forum why on earth did she give me all the information on the past 3A members to compare to the members here? How do you think I know who the trolls are? It isn't through my instincts!!"

That's right, the admin of one forum took personal details of her members and gave them to the admin of another forum.

I need to add no more.

Friday, March 26, 2010

Case study- 3As hasbeens, googlestalking and YOU

A poster with the nickname Housebythesea took rightful umbrage to an unprompted attack by Laffin Assasin on MM.
Apparently Laffin did not like the poster's avatar.

MM moderator Antoinette decided to apologise.
Now witness how the 3As gang use the flimsiest of excuses to google stalk a poster:


I feel bad for HBTS though. She didn't do anything wrong and is getting dragged into this. I'm going to post an explanation to her on the
thread to explain.

Good idea....Woof!!


Just one thought - I wonder what HBTS actually googled to find that avatar? It certainly was not 'house by the sea'.

Enter Hercule Poirot.


No I have been through 50 pages of google pictures .

Only 50?


And there's a little of arrogance on her last post. I can understand her reasons, but it's up to her to say or to leave. I'm too tired to type today and answer her, but she doesn't need to lecture anyone now.

Add a dash of character assassination.......


maybe downloaded from a camera/phone and uploaded from the pc. wouldn't be unheard of would it?

Sounds reasonable. Back on track......


But that's not how they said they acquired it Marky - they said it was randomly chosen from a google search. on Studies site. Obviously, only mods can vouch for this accuracy of this quote. But, if it's accurate, I would say that HBTS is lying (again) imho.

Oh Dear. Poster says they randomly chose the image from google. 3As hasbeens cannot find said image in google therefore poster is evil.

I don't quite understand...what is the relevance of that picture? Is it someone's house on here?

Good Question.


It seems to be relevant to Laffin, if you read the PM exchange that HBTS forwarded to the mods (posted on Diseased Subjects blog).

"It seems to be relevant to Laffin"
There you have it!


Laffin Assasin made a veiled threat to another person's children on an alleged missing children's forum and was banned by Eddiemod.
Laffin Assasin also threatened another poster(HBTS) because he was suspicious of the poster's avatar.(I'm not kidding, dogs don't lie and that.)

What was the result?
Eddiemod was banned (and just to be crystal clear, Eddiemod has never given information to this blog.)
Laffin Assasin was reinstated on the forum.
HBTS resigned and was subsequently googlestalked by the 3As hasbeens because they could not locate the image in google.

Official Statement

Please note that we would like to make an announcement concerning the fate of the moderator known as eddie and her two friends David and Harvesmom.

We can state categorically that we have never received any information from eddie or her friends.

We have noted how these people have been prejudged without evidence and have subsequently been subject to mobbing and character assassination by the admin, the remainder of the moderators of the forum in question, members of private forums including members of an erstwhile ex (in the "dead parrot" sense) forum.

The vilification and defamation that occurred is totally wrong since eddie has done absolutely nothing in relation to this blog.

Of course, we will not be revealing our true sauce since that would be a breach of confidence.

End of announcement.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Add Another To The List


Edd, I know you didn't like Bren photon & jjp but did you have to go about it in this way to try and get rid of them.

You were a well-trusted person on this forum and you fucked it all up just because you didn't like a few people. As I said before I don't like Bren but I'm not going to go out of my way to get rid of her.

Cannot believe you could misuse the trust everyone had in you on here. I'm sure there is an explanation to this but for the life of me I can't think of 1. One thing though at least it's out in the open now and we can all get back to normal knowing we have no mole about.

Monday, March 22, 2010

Emotional Blackmail

Stick with this one to see the whole story.


Pm's from house by the see

laffin sent these to him

2nd message is one he has sent to Amber also


From Housebythesea To Antoinette, Today at 9:10 am

I am going to forward on to you the messages I have left for Ambersuz, and which she hasn't picked up yet. Hopefully, they will be self-explanatory, especially if you read the two threads concerned.

I only joined here quite recently, and I will not tolerate someone's blatant attempts to bully me or others. I have given Laffin no cause for any complaint, nor have I indicated any sympathy with my McCann brigade - far from it !

If you would like to start by reading those messages, perhaps?

Thank you

Inbox :: Message

From Housebythesea To Antoinette, Today at 9:12 am
As discussed

Dear Ambersuz,

I wish to complain about the above poster, who appears to have decided to single me out for his unwelcome attentions, starting with some very odd private messages, and continuing this evening with a series of allegations, seemingly about my motives for being here. Please look at these two threads

Now, I don't know what his problem is. He seems to be under the impression that anyone who can string a sentence together is some kind of 'mole', which is beyond paranoid, frankly. His behaviour is rude and abusive in the extreme, and if he thinks he's bullying me off the forum he can think again.

I only joined here recently. I've been enjoying posting, and cannot see where I could have possibly given offence. I am very disappointed that Laffin seems to believe it's okay to behave in this fashion, whilst at the same time criticising other forums for the way they treat people.

I am forwarding to you the interchange of private messages between he and I . As you will see, I became alarmed by the tone and asked him to take it up with yourself if he had a problem.

I'd like to know what you intend to do about this, please. I appreciate he has been here a lot longer than me, but that does not give him the right to attempt to bully me off the forum for no other reason than his own groundless paranoia.

Thank you


Sunday, March 21, 2010

Expert opinion.

Bren offers her advice:

I know many people came here from the old 3A's, I am not saying the old 3A's was perfect because it was not, it was a learning curve for many of us. The only forums I took part in before running the old 3a's and the new 3a's was Daily Mirror Hunt for Maddy forum and Bar Arguido (which lasted about 3 weeks). And I know some people do not want to hear about the old 3a's but sometimes things have to be mentioned whether we like it or not.
When the old 3a's went, Amber had been running this forum for months before, and she had no problems at all. But she kindly took in every member that had no home to post on and her and her mods made everyone welcome. Amber and her team have never had to deal with troll invasions, people trying to cause problems, hacking of accounts, cloning of accounts, sustained attacks on a forum, complaints going into hosts etc, like we did on the old 3a's, until she gave everyone a home.
Amber and her team are still on that learning curve and they need everyone to help them.
To Amber and her team, I take my hat off to, because not many people would have taken on what you have taken on. People are out there and want to divide and conquer and they will try everything, even down to try and insinuate that there is "bad blood" between forums. Ignore them, there is no bad blood, there is no animosity, there is no knifes being drawn at dawn, it is all scaremongering and raking up people's paranoia.
There are 3 forums out there in cyberworld, and 3 forums that are united in Justice for Madeleine, and 3 forums that value new members and new ideas and opinions. Please don't listen to the distractor's, the disruptors and ignore them completely, they are out to cause problems between people so that in the end mods and admin feel "bugger this for a game of soldiers" and close their doors.
As I said Amber and her team are still learning, they will come across new problems every day, they will make mistakes, just like everyone else, but once a mistake is made they will rectify. Just give them support and time to sort things out.

eddie the mod on Bren and co

Amber the people on this forum ie bren, jjp etc are arseholes.

Eddie (not me, woof) suggests a new filing system for Bren's opinions

Eddie to David:

David I am not discussing this anymore. I am more annoyed at the fucking hypocrisy of the prats who want their accouts deleted! Let them fuck off then, and Bren can stick her comments up her stupid tight arse.

Amber's donation and eddie doesn't like Bren and Photon

Ambersuz to eddie (Not me ! the other eddie! woof!):

There's no rules but as a mod you should do whats best for the forum.....TB was part of this forum and was taking money from people....I sent him over £500 so I think I have reason to speak out about a fraudster!
If we are comparing now and since you're having a dig at me about TB, what about Kazcut? You went out of your way to be nice to that nasty bitch for over a year on Sky and no one told you not to!
I know you are itching to take out Bren and Photon and a few others....because your instinct tells you you dont like them.....thats not a good enough reason IMO.....sorry!

FSoares has a confession.......

To be honest, I am going to make you a confession here: we read the PMs from the 1st hacked database. You may not know the full story, but NBrado has put the database on the internet for download. Of course downloading it, wasn't enough to crack and start reading because NBrado never expected someone else outside his group could crack it, but, with the help of someone who's also a member on this forum, we were able to read it. After what I read, I can garantee you there's someone almost everybody loves, holding another forum, and if you had the chance to read what we read, you'd be surprised and probably shocked at the arrogance. However, nobody suspects that person can be that arrogant. Bren has never open her mouth about it. As for Bren doubting ashwill, I wouldn't give too much importance to it, believe me. If paranoia is in the air, it can happen. We all doubt some posters sometimes, to later find out they are genuine. It has happened to me as well.

Hoiler Than Thou

We seem to have been receiving visits from this address:


Moderators lounge?

Bren's holier than thou post?

All is not happy in the mod asylum.

Too many....conflicts of interest.

Stay tuned.

There appears to be a traitor in their midst.......

Monday, March 15, 2010

The Cryptic One

Speak up, man, say what you mean.

"The spies are in here, as I thought they might be."

"Now I know, who twitches my radar ?

Who twitches yours ?"

"Deep-embedded, and trying to be 'holier' than thou !!

It's the same stunt's [sic] that were 'pulled' at 3 A's [sic] in it's [sic] latter days.

So that points towards 'certain' folks.

the 'target' gets smaller by the day."


"Do tell then [redacted], dont [sic] keep us in suspense."


"It's hard to explain, fully.

But look at who was attempting to cause chaos tonight at around 6;30 till seven 7;30, then go and have a looks [sic] around some of the anti blogs.

That attempt at the '[redacted]' stunt was started elsewhere, but it's been deleted now.

[redacted]'s blog was interesting at around 6:38. then following the trail and seeing who did what was quite illuminating.

It's the same old tried and tested methods, it's time they thought up a new Modus operandi.

Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer, is an old political saying, I believe."


"More riddles."


"[redacted] can you tell me whats [sic] on your mind please?"


Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Private Forums

OK, the SSS is pretty dead now after leaking like a sieve.

A number of respected members have been disenfranchised as they have set up a new forum for the real trusties.

It's called TLC.

The Sauce and Little Birdie are still active moling away.

TLC? Tender Loving Care? No, the more prosaic The Leisure Centre.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Temper Temper

"FFS I don't care anymore I have not told anyone to hound [redacted] over this, I don't care if it is true or not, I am just fúckíng sick of being dragged into things which I am not party to and those that know the truth fail to speak out. Sorry but this has now gone beyond a joke, I am not responsible for what others do, I do not hold guns to peoples head and tell them to do this or else. He made [redacted]'s life hell, [redacted] was being blamed for being someone on a forum when he was not, [redacted] and I could not allow that, [redacted] was sassy on his crappy forum and we could not allow [redacted] to take the blame. Do I regret putting him right, yes and no. Yes in the way it was done but no for putting him straight. Perhaps it would have been best just to come out and admit on 3a's (sic) that [redacted] can't be sassy because [redacted] is and end it there, hindsight is a wonderful thing. But we wanted to still try and keep sassy in the forum to find out what was being said and what attacks were being said.

There is a whole lot of truth that none of you know and truth that will never be spoken, no matter how much it needs to be told, but I know for a fact it is because of the truth that [redacted], [redacted] and myself are so viciously attacked. Well it is getting to the point where I don't care if I have one friend or not in this whole mess I will end up speaking it. [redacted] is a stirrer along with the rest of them.

I have never given anybodies (sic) details out to anybody, no matter what is being said. But a lot of things have dawned on me today and I can see things a whole lot clearly. And I am washing my hands of the whole bloody lot of it. Just because I spoke out about those names being put out, it seems I am being slayed for that. As I said these people know the truth, they were all there and they just find it so easy to blame those that were not even party to it and only heard it second hand, just shows what guts they really do have."

Friday, February 26, 2010

Ratting On Each Other

"Is this [redacted]'s office address? How did they get that?"


"The only person who knows that is [redacted, cough] as he sent the booklets office is not in any way connected to my name so you wont (sic) find the company online unless you know the name of it....try googling my name and if you find a connection to my office then I'll eat my hat!"

Someone else was outed too, country roads, nudge nudge wink wink.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Concerning Moles

"I've tried to look at IP's (sic) here to see if people coming from another forum are known and I cannot see I am sure on other forums it cannot be traced back here but people on blogs must be able to see it....I must ask [redacted] if I can put a link here to her blog, click directly to it and see if she can trace me back to here...."


"To read the contents of threads here, they might need to alter some numerical sequence on the referrer link. For instance, on the link I posted as an example, I've altered from 21 to 22. Those without access, trip on the link ending on "21" but changing to "22", it's like being registered. So, even if they can do it, they will just read one specific page from the thread they got the referrer. However, it would be good to not click on any link posted here, because even if they can't read it back, they will know right away the thread's name."


"Yes thats (sic) exactly what I thought....its (sic) much the same when you click on a cached only see that particular one.

So basically no mole"


"The truth is that if there was anything juicy for them to find and crow about - they would have done so. In reality I suspect that if there is a mole, then that mole is probably bored out of his/her mind by the lack of posts here for them to find fault with."


"Oh there's a mole alright (sic, not our house style) but she cannot give them any details that would make them happy as its (sic) all about their trolling friends

What she's looking for is personal stuff about us and there is none here....thats (sic) what she's been ordered to take back.

If they all thought some of us didnt (sic) know about this well they thought wrong....I let her stay and she knows it...I knew their game but they didnt (sic) know mine.... "

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Getting Stick

It gets to them sometimes.

"[redacted]....we had a whole section about Sky rants if you one complained about that....why because you all knew what the Sky lot were like and you all bitched about them and made fun of them most of the time AND it was all out in the open unlike this one where we can say what we feel and not have our every word challenged!

The thing I'm admin here and we took on all the 3A members I am the one getting the stick for it just like [redacted] took the stick for being admin of the 3A's (sic)....none of the other mods are getting called names day in and day out....I have a right to defend myself just like you all did day and night on the Sky rant threads and on the other private one for detectives!....we had a whole section about Sky rants if you one complained about that....why because you all knew what the Sky lot were like and you all bitched about them and made fun of them most of the time AND it was all out in the open unlike this one where we can say what we feel and not have our every word challenged!

The thing I'm admin here and we took on all the 3A members I am the one getting the stick for it just like [redacted] took the stick for being admin of the 3A's (sic)....none of the other mods are getting called names day in and day out....I have a right to defend myself just like you all did day and night on the Sky rant threads and on the other private one for detectives!"

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

I Vill Make A Rule

Power-crazed or what?

"I knew [redacted] would blame someone else. And [redacted] replied to me about one of my posts I made about him, I have told him never to contact me again and that I will be setting up a rule that he will get DO NOT CONTACT ME ANYMORE replies should he try."

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Someone is Getting Touchy

...and swings into action.

"[redacted] playing games and posting cryptic messages - nothing new - but his methodology is flawed when he has to be tipped off.

Perhaps we should all do as [redacted] admits he does and simply play forum games.

It isn't what I came to the forums for though. I suspect lots of people have just allowed themselves to be dragged into the nastiness. Well good luck to the lot of them. They are beneath contempt.

Email and chat with who you like [redacted] and play whatever games you like - enjoy it all and talk whatever gibberish you want.

I will restrict my reading now to serious posters who are not deliberately playing sick games on the memory of a small child, whose motives are not self and ego and vindictiveness, who are not hypocritical by nature and whose interest is the actual case.

Once again you have repeated a question which I have already answered. You did that last night as well. To repeat - I don't intend to stoop as low as those who post up private details everywhere.

First time I have blocked a poster on any forum but consider it done as soon as I find the place to do it. I am fed up with your cryptic comments and game playing and inability to read the answers that you are given.

If this post sees me banned from this forum then so be it."

Saturday, February 13, 2010


"This has got way out of hand now, there is no alternative but to shut these forums down and just give up on this case. There is a whole lot of truth out there that people do not know and unless we go down to their level it will never be known.

I can't sit back and watch [redacted] and [redacted] be destroyed like this and neither can I see other mods threatened that their lives will be exposed by associating themselves with me.

I wish [redacted] all the best, and thanks for allowing me to post here. If you could delete my account [redacted] then perhaps they will lay off you a bit."


"This is a very, very sad day. [redacted] has taken a huge amout (sic) of shit for being Admin of 3As (the original) and now Headlines and the New 3As. Despite all of that she has put a phenomenal amount of work into keeping the forums running not to mention dealing with the fall out of the two separate Mod exoduses, and the anxiety and stress surrounding the [redacted] debacle and the later 'open back door' which led to the theft of the database backup files. She didn't deserve a millionth of what was handed out to her. [The opposition] have greater manpower - and the core of them came prepared. They knew the rules of engagement - we didn't. It's very considerate of [redacted] to think of her mods/friends - I very grateful for that (and for lots of other things too).

But - the opposition are not going to give up just because you've gone [redacted]."

She's gone, she's back, she's gone, she's back...

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

The Plug-in

"What feckin part of I could not read your PM's do you not undertand (sic), the PM's (sic)that were shown to me were extracted by [redacted] not myself and I read them in an MSN conversation and not via the forum. Nobody has denied that [redacted] extracted them and [redacted] and I read them, he feckin admitted it himself on the forum when the question was raised and he also posted that I could not do it. But still hare you want to accuse of me of knowing about plug-ins etc, I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT ANY FECKIN PLUG INS.. Get it. So you can take your accusations shove them up your arse and set light to them for all I care Hare, because you are just as bad as twats etc.

And by the way if you realised within 5 minutes that he had installed a plug in why the feck did you not warn me or any of the other mods. You just make me sick.

You saw this happening and never mentioned it to anyone.......thanks a lot hare and by the way whilst we are on the subject, I agreed with you when you were carrying on hell for leather at [redacted], because I thought you were right in what you were saying, he should have taken more responsibility for what he did and for allowing the database to be exposed."


"Don't talk over me [redacted], I am here and answering you. I was told by [redacted] he did this because [redacted] was posting comments accusing admin of things and not spilling the beans about what she was supposed to have known, even though he had asked her outright and so had I on various threads. Was it wrong, yes it was, sorry but I was being lead to believe the forum was being compromised and he saw it as a threat and that was his excuse for doing it.

Personally I would have banned [redacted] for not putting up what she was accusing Admin of and got rid of her as a troublemaker.

But hand on heart [redacted], I did not know about any plug-in and I bet I am the only fecker that never downloaded the database that [redacted] exposed. And I never downloaded the database from the links that was exposed by [redacted]'s working practices. My god don't you think I wish I had, because if I had I would have taken that to another host and got shot of him."

You Cannot Be Serious

Listen up. The Sauce and The Little Birdie are well and currently active.

Get it now? Time to close it. Eddie wins.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Non E Piu (It Is No More)

The mind of a pitchforker at work.

"Please don't take offence [redacted], but this stems from people wanting the likes of the 3a's (sic) forum off the internet. Underhand tactics were being played by people and instead of the usual pro v anti it turned sinister and started to make anti turn on anti and this was being done via lies and deceit.
I know 3a's (sic) is dead and gone but I think we really need to get to the bottom of who was playing all the games because even thought they succeeded with 3a's (sic) it has been a tried and tested measure and it will not be long before they start here. That I am certain of. Already they tried to cause [redacted] problems by faking a PM and making out she was sending it to some mods and not others.

Sorry to say this is just not trolls at work, this is someone who in my opinion is paid to cause all these problems for forums that are discussing the case. Now the only way of really beating them is to expose them and show them up for what they are, deniers of justice."

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Trouble At T'Mill

"No high horse at all. No lecture at all. Read the post - it was not condescending (as from a high horse) nor was it in any way similar to a lecture.

I was simply expressing bafflement at a totally odd post that looked as if it was really a lost pm back to an individual member, who had earlier communicated by email with you, rather than a constructive post. I was expressing the fact that I was unable to understand the post as it seemed to contain references only one other poster might understand. I was not attempting to be rude to you, just making it clear that I was tired and was unable to understand.

As for influence - yes I was a volunteer mod/co-admin on one previous forum. That doesn't give a person a massive amount of influence, you know. The forum owners/admin have the influence and can instantly rid themselves of any mod or co-admin who they no longer want. It was a very time-consuming task. Ask any mod how much time it took to try to keep that forum afloat, especially when on the one hand there were large numbers of posters who had the direct intention of destroying the place and ON THE OTHER HAND THERE WERE POSTERS WHOSE POSTING STYLE WAS OFTEN GUARANTEED TO INFLAME SITUATIONS (either because they were drunk while posting, because they were unable to control their own emotions, or because they were deliberately confrontational).

I did not pull the plug on 3As. I have explained this, as honestly and clearly as I could before, but will repeat it for the benefit of yourself and others who may not have seen that earlier explanation.

At a time when there were only a very small number of largely inexperienced mods and myself around - the leaflets in Rothley affair blew up. I contacted [redacted] without any success whatsoever. He refused to respond - though I know for certain that he was in contact with a former mod of the forum. I had very good advice at the time (later proven absolutely correct) that the content of a large number of posts to that date were liable to be pounced on by certain lawyers (as [redacted] found to his cost (literally)). The moderation team at that point was unable to undertake the work necessary to check and purge the forum. The other co-admin was on holiday. I felt I had no option at all but to close the forum to public view. I explained at the time on the site and in other places what I had done and that I was trying to contact [redacted]. As for pulling the plug - I had no power whatsoever to do that - I had no access to the server or to the facilities to close the forum.

Your insult that I skulked away is also incorrect. One other factor that contributed to my decision to close the forum to public view was that I was booked to go away on holiday (for a month) just a couple of days after I closed it. At that point the 3As which was owned by [redacted] and had one administrator, again [redacted], would have been without any admin or co-admin for a week as my holidays co-incided (sic) with the other co-admin. It would have resulted in a small group of junior mods being responsible for a very busy forum without sufficient powers to be able to deal with problems at a time when such problems were almost inevitable. Therefore I 'parked' the forum. I repeat I did not 'pull the plug'.

As for 'socks'. At the direct request of [redacted] I created one 'sock' which served a testing purpose for him. I also used 2 other 'socks' at a later date. I am afraid my memory does not stretch back far enough to recall how many posts were made, nor have I any method of now checking the facts but I think it was around a dozen - all made with the sole intention of attempting to ensure the safety of the 3As forum - believe it or not.

I stated I had no intention of raising these issues again in the post I made when temporarily (as I thought) closing the 3As forum. Your ill-informed post gave me no option.

And I am not now skulking away - I am going out to enjoy my Sunday breakfast and lunch with friends.

ps - Yes, maybe this post could be described as being from 'on a high horse' but this one was meant to be."

Friday, February 5, 2010


I'd just like to tell you all that I have found a way of reading the secret part.

Just to show you that this is true, I can say that the last thread is murat-fan-has-my-photos-on-her-blog-t7476-75.htm

Thursday, February 4, 2010


An announcement will be made on here tomorrow at 3pm PST, 11pm GMT.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

February 5th

There will be a small announcement on here on Friday 5th February.

At 3pm California time.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Infiltrated Did He Say?

"Just face it, the forum, is well infiltrated, I have a different style of dealing with them than others do, I am a tw@t, they hate me, I don't care, but for all you polite and decent people, I'm prepared to take the hit's (sic), I know some of you don't agree with my style, but please trust me on this, I can see through some of them as soon as they put their first post up."

Yes, of course you can. Not.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Another Silly Plan

"I'm going to take the forum down for 10 minutes - to see reactions.

going going gone"


"Well I was hoping all the trolls would be running around like headless chickens....if they did it today with the MF when its only being updated then 2 Maddie forums down in one day would make their week....

little do they know that both are very safe and wont be going anywhere!"


"I'm sorry if I scared the genuine members here and on others forums but as I said I was getting fed up of the paranoia about the MF on here tonight and seeing people attacking (redacted) on other forums so I made the decision and (redacted) said to use her number!

I only meant to take it down for 10 minutes but I had to take an important phone call so it was a bit longer!"

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Little Do They Know

p: is this the first or second set of ex-mods? (JAT or FTT)

cm: JAT

D: I got my IP banned with JAT and I was only reading! I use a proxy now to have a look at the dreadful threads

cm: lol i use proxys (sic) too

A: Me too now although I cant (sic) from the office....

I'll bet BB1 isnt (sic) boasting about this forum I'm sure none of them can access it!


Tuesday, January 26, 2010

A Small Rant

"Actually Laffin scrap that previous post, who the hell do you think you are talking to? Just because I won't tell you things that happened between the mods and admin of the 3a's, which is actually NONE of your business, how dare you accuse me of walking away?

If I was walking away, I would have started a forum without a Madeleine section and not sat up for nearly two nights copying the DVD forum over twice so that members could have access to the files.

Your bully boy tactics do not wash with me Laffin, so don't even try it."

Monday, January 25, 2010

It's All A Big Conspiracy Apparently

"There's so many of them, on at all times of day and night (or rather there were,'til recent bannings (sic) ). I really do believe the majority of them are paid to do it (though some will always do it free as a labour of hate).

It wouldn't suprise (sic) me if either the McCanns or the MMU [Ed: government??] were involved. After all the fund accounts did show an amount spent on a 'poster' campaign, which could possibly be construed in a number of ways. And some disruptions of particular threads have always appeared (to me) to have an orchestrated air about them, in order to try and kill certain thread, there are sometimes patterns, if you look carefully, imo.

There are also, though, those who disrupt purely from mischief and malice and a misplaced sense of 'loyalty' and intellectual superiority."

Sunday, January 24, 2010

A Cunning Plan

"Best way to beat them is imo going underground. I know everyone wants to get the word out but sometimes google can be your enemy as well as your friend. If I was in Debbie and Tony's shoes now, I would completely do a 180 and offer to work alongside the McCann's in order to get the case re-opened and to get Leicester Police active on the case, something we all know the McCann's do not want. And I would definitely bypass Clarence Mitchell in all of this, I know it would cost a bit, but to take an ad out in the British Tabloids and to do a statement and pay for it's print might be away of forcing the McCann's hand. Just imagine what the public's reaction would be if they declined such help. You know thinking about this Tony and Debbie could spin this better than Clarence Mitchell ever could, might mean having to eat humble pie a bit, but with the right phrases and objections, it could put Team McCann in a right old spin, especially if it was printed in every tabloid."

Daft or what?

Saturday, January 23, 2010

1-2-3, It's Easy

"I used to post at the Green board and another tiny private forum, but it's amazing the lengths the "spys" (sic) will go to to get in them."

Lengths? Nah, very simple.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Logically Speaking...

"I've been looking at the welcome threads to see who is recognised which means zilch seeing as so many have been outed as clones but you can get an indication by it at least!

And no worries if we make a mistake....they are out the moment they get caught in here misbehaving."

Logically speaking, they would only be able to kick someone out if they caught them. If they weren't caught, they'd still be in there. That is unless they kicked some out for other reasons although my source may have eluded that.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Select Users

"Only select users are allowed in this part of the forum"

It all started last August, a supposed serious supporters section, private, not for everyone's eyes. Eddie has procured this information through a friend.

"So hopefully there will be no arguments.

I have tried adding all of the posters that I feel should be here however I do not know all the 3A members that are trusted so feel free to throw in some usernames I may have forgotten!"


"Be carefull (sic), some of them aren't what they seem to be. It's even confusing me and I thought I was a good troll spotter."

So true, my cohorts were there right from the beginning.