A poster with the nickname Housebythesea took rightful umbrage to an unprompted attack by Laffin Assasin on MM.
Apparently Laffin did not like the poster's avatar.
MM moderator Antoinette decided to apologise.
Now witness how the 3As gang use the flimsiest of excuses to google stalk a poster:
Antoinette:
I feel bad for HBTS though. She didn't do anything wrong and is getting dragged into this. I'm going to post an explanation to her on the
thread to explain.
Good idea....Woof!!
jjp:
Just one thought - I wonder what HBTS actually googled to find that avatar? It certainly was not 'house by the sea'.
Enter Hercule Poirot.
Bren:
No I have been through 50 pages of google pictures .
Only 50?
FSoares:
And there's a little of arrogance on her last post. I can understand her reasons, but it's up to her to say or to leave. I'm too tired to type today and answer her, but she doesn't need to lecture anyone now.
Add a dash of character assassination.......
Marky:
maybe downloaded from a camera/phone and uploaded from the pc. wouldn't be unheard of would it?
Sounds reasonable. Back on track......
Photon:
But that's not how they said they acquired it Marky - they said it was randomly chosen from a google search. on Studies site. Obviously, only mods can vouch for this accuracy of this quote. But, if it's accurate, I would say that HBTS is lying (again) imho.
Oh Dear. Poster says they randomly chose the image from google. 3As hasbeens cannot find said image in google therefore poster is evil.
Angelina:
I don't quite understand...what is the relevance of that picture? Is it someone's house on here?
Good Question.
Photon:
It seems to be relevant to Laffin, if you read the PM exchange that HBTS forwarded to the mods (posted on Diseased Subjects blog).
"It seems to be relevant to Laffin"
There you have it!
------------------------
Recap:
Laffin Assasin made a veiled threat to another person's children on an alleged missing children's forum and was banned by Eddiemod.
Laffin Assasin also threatened another poster(HBTS) because he was suspicious of the poster's avatar.(I'm not kidding, dogs don't lie and that.)
What was the result?
Eddiemod was banned (and just to be crystal clear, Eddiemod has never given information to this blog.)
Laffin Assasin was reinstated on the forum.
HBTS resigned and was subsequently googlestalked by the 3As hasbeens because they could not locate the image in google.
Showing posts with label FSoares. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FSoares. Show all posts
Friday, March 26, 2010
Sunday, July 12, 2009
So how does one get a press card?
Hi Bjr,
I've decided to send you this PM, after reading Levy's thread and another one I can't remember the title. Both are locked, so, I couldn't post.
However, I think I need to clarify one thing about 'journalist sources' and the way it works in Portugal. In Portugal, asking a journalist to tell what are his/her sources, is considered lack of ethics. So, each time, someone starts to doubt on someone and what that person posts/writes on articles, it's raining in the wet, as I use to say. Even Courts of Law can't ask that question.They are actually protected by the journalism Law in Portugal. If the person is really a journalist (even free lancer) and holds a Press Card, it's no use to ask for his/her sources. Not even in a Court they'd revealed anything, and, there's already lots of cases where Courts of Law tried to know what were the sources to no avail. Law gives them protection.
So, in my humble opinion, some posters didn't follow the right path, when they started to question the veracity of Levy, Paulo Reis or even another friend they have (never posted on the forum) author of more than one publication about Madeleine McCann. They're all journalists, I can garantee you.
Anyway, hope you understand what I mean. A journalist will never, ever reveal the source, neither the way he got the info. The only thing we can do is to believe it or not.
Best regards,
F. Soares
I've decided to send you this PM, after reading Levy's thread and another one I can't remember the title. Both are locked, so, I couldn't post.
However, I think I need to clarify one thing about 'journalist sources' and the way it works in Portugal. In Portugal, asking a journalist to tell what are his/her sources, is considered lack of ethics. So, each time, someone starts to doubt on someone and what that person posts/writes on articles, it's raining in the wet, as I use to say. Even Courts of Law can't ask that question.They are actually protected by the journalism Law in Portugal. If the person is really a journalist (even free lancer) and holds a Press Card, it's no use to ask for his/her sources. Not even in a Court they'd revealed anything, and, there's already lots of cases where Courts of Law tried to know what were the sources to no avail. Law gives them protection.
So, in my humble opinion, some posters didn't follow the right path, when they started to question the veracity of Levy, Paulo Reis or even another friend they have (never posted on the forum) author of more than one publication about Madeleine McCann. They're all journalists, I can garantee you.
Anyway, hope you understand what I mean. A journalist will never, ever reveal the source, neither the way he got the info. The only thing we can do is to believe it or not.
Best regards,
F. Soares
Monday, July 6, 2009
PJ on the forum? Isn't that just a leetle bit dodgy?
FSoares (F*******)
"Thank you so much Mr. Benett.
Yes, I think probably the word 'plot' is the right one for tramar, looking at the examples you kindly provided.
As for my job in PJ, and since I work up here in the North - in Porto - I couldn't have access to any type of special information/knowledge about the case. Sometimes I had the feeling there was a curtain of silence around it, and it looked like nobody wanted to talk or comment the case. Once, in the Summer of 2007, I emailed that woman that we could all see on pics, dusting for prints on the shutters, but, what she replied back was completely bogus and it also looked like she wanted to avoid saying anything about the case. I then stopped. I also thought it could be due to the fact that emailing via the internal system could not be good, as the IT department could read everything, if they wanted.
Unfortunatelly, I felt obliged to send Stinky a PM about my workplace as I've explained before. Beachy wasn't a problem to me and neither is you, but Stinky 'scares' me a little. That's why I avoid posting too much nowadays as I don't trust him and have a bad vibe about him. He once implied he had a very good knowledge about Joana's case and also about the details of the alleged 'torture' commited by the officers who were brought from Lisbon, under Amaral's orders. It's fishy as he can't know nothing the rest of public knows, unless:
1) he works for local Public Prosecution - or from somewhere else and someone leaked something;
2) He's from Police and has a personal agenda against Goncalo Amaral. It doesn't look so to me, because otherwise he wouldn't be a Police basher, as he is;
3) I'm pretty convinced if he cold get my identity he would whistle about it to someone from the Prosecution. That's why I am always acting with precaution.
My name is F******a R*****. My English sucks, but if you need any kind of help for anything, please feel free to ask."
Yes, I think probably the word 'plot' is the right one for tramar, looking at the examples you kindly provided.
As for my job in PJ, and since I work up here in the North - in Porto - I couldn't have access to any type of special information/knowledge about the case. Sometimes I had the feeling there was a curtain of silence around it, and it looked like nobody wanted to talk or comment the case. Once, in the Summer of 2007, I emailed that woman that we could all see on pics, dusting for prints on the shutters, but, what she replied back was completely bogus and it also looked like she wanted to avoid saying anything about the case. I then stopped. I also thought it could be due to the fact that emailing via the internal system could not be good, as the IT department could read everything, if they wanted.
Unfortunatelly, I felt obliged to send Stinky a PM about my workplace as I've explained before. Beachy wasn't a problem to me and neither is you, but Stinky 'scares' me a little. That's why I avoid posting too much nowadays as I don't trust him and have a bad vibe about him. He once implied he had a very good knowledge about Joana's case and also about the details of the alleged 'torture' commited by the officers who were brought from Lisbon, under Amaral's orders. It's fishy as he can't know nothing the rest of public knows, unless:
1) he works for local Public Prosecution - or from somewhere else and someone leaked something;
2) He's from Police and has a personal agenda against Goncalo Amaral. It doesn't look so to me, because otherwise he wouldn't be a Police basher, as he is;
3) I'm pretty convinced if he cold get my identity he would whistle about it to someone from the Prosecution. That's why I am always acting with precaution.
My name is F******a R*****. My English sucks, but if you need any kind of help for anything, please feel free to ask."
What WAS she doing on 3As then?
FSoares wrote:
Sentinel,
It's not my opinion. I know where I work and I know some facts.
I don't want posted this on the forum, but I work for Ministry of Justice. And some things are impossible to back up on the forum.
Sentinel,
It's not my opinion. I know where I work and I know some facts.
I don't want posted this on the forum, but I work for Ministry of Justice. And some things are impossible to back up on the forum.
More Portuguese infighting and distrust
Hi Beachy,
Before I answer you, I am here trying to read all the posts I can from StinkySardine. You may not believe me, but I have a feeling there's something wrong about him that I can't put my finger on.
Since the first moments he was posting, I always had a feeling he was a disguised "pro-McCann" who came to the forum, teaching lessons on the PT law system. To be frank, I have a feeling he is not a lawyer, or, if he is, he's someone linked to the Bar Association trying to f*ck up the Police in this case about Leonor Cipriano and the so-supposed torture.
I keep telling you, I knew there was something wrong about him. I am convinced he is a Magistrate, otherwise, as a lawyer he couldn't have told Pear on a relatively recent post, he knew 'too much' about the case.
To be frank, he can't know too much about the case, unless he worked on it.It's quite obvious he is not from the Police, but, I am starting to feel he either belongs to the lawyer team or he's a Magistrate.
I am here trying to get a clue, but something definatelly is wrong. I don't trust him. It's just a feeling but generally my feelings are in the majority of times, correct. Hope I'm wrong this time.
Kisses
Fernanda (FSoares)
Before I answer you, I am here trying to read all the posts I can from StinkySardine. You may not believe me, but I have a feeling there's something wrong about him that I can't put my finger on.
Since the first moments he was posting, I always had a feeling he was a disguised "pro-McCann" who came to the forum, teaching lessons on the PT law system. To be frank, I have a feeling he is not a lawyer, or, if he is, he's someone linked to the Bar Association trying to f*ck up the Police in this case about Leonor Cipriano and the so-supposed torture.
I keep telling you, I knew there was something wrong about him. I am convinced he is a Magistrate, otherwise, as a lawyer he couldn't have told Pear on a relatively recent post, he knew 'too much' about the case.
To be frank, he can't know too much about the case, unless he worked on it.It's quite obvious he is not from the Police, but, I am starting to feel he either belongs to the lawyer team or he's a Magistrate.
I am here trying to get a clue, but something definatelly is wrong. I don't trust him. It's just a feeling but generally my feelings are in the majority of times, correct. Hope I'm wrong this time.
Kisses
Fernanda (FSoares)
Sunday, July 5, 2009
No love lost between the Portuguese either!
FSoares to beachy:
It's no longer necessary. Thank you!!
Joana was an asshole to me, because she knew I was working on the subtitles - and in my back, she was doing it as well. She sent the link to the forum without telling me, I should stop working on it. I lost one day working on them.
It was an eye opener because I always felt there was something about Joana. Her normal arrogance and lack of manners always surprised me. She just wants protagonism. It's not the first time the Mods have to edit her posts, to remove the offensive remarks towards almost every one.
As a sequence of this sad saga, I would like to ask you one thing: do you know who Astro is? I know she has met with some posters of the forum. I also know - because she posted it a long time ago - she lives in Portimâo. However, I have reasons to believe the following:
1) She has two nicks and she's also Joana (and Joana has several nicks);
2) She is the wife of the person who conducted things.
It's no longer necessary. Thank you!!
Joana was an asshole to me, because she knew I was working on the subtitles - and in my back, she was doing it as well. She sent the link to the forum without telling me, I should stop working on it. I lost one day working on them.
It was an eye opener because I always felt there was something about Joana. Her normal arrogance and lack of manners always surprised me. She just wants protagonism. It's not the first time the Mods have to edit her posts, to remove the offensive remarks towards almost every one.
As a sequence of this sad saga, I would like to ask you one thing: do you know who Astro is? I know she has met with some posters of the forum. I also know - because she posted it a long time ago - she lives in Portimâo. However, I have reasons to believe the following:
1) She has two nicks and she's also Joana (and Joana has several nicks);
2) She is the wife of the person who conducted things.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)